Youssefi v Mussellwhite [electronic resource]
Language: English Publication details: 2014Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: [2014] EWCA Civ 885, 2 July 2014. Appeal by tenant M against CC's decision to uphold landlord Y's refusual to grant a new tenancy under the Landlord and Tenant Act Part II s30(1) due to failure to comply with the repairing covenant in the lease, persistent late payment of rent, failure to permit access for inspection by M and her agents and breach of a covenant in the lease to keep premises open as a shop or a cafe to visiting members of the public. "Held" appeal allowed under s30(1)(a) on the grounds that the findings of the fact in relation to the disprepair were not sufficiently substantial to justify refusal of a new tenancy.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | Virtual Online | ONLINE PUBLICATION (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 158216-2001 |
[2014] EWCA Civ 885, 2 July 2014. Appeal by tenant M against CC's decision to uphold landlord Y's refusual to grant a new tenancy under the Landlord and Tenant Act Part II s30(1) due to failure to comply with the repairing covenant in the lease, persistent late payment of rent, failure to permit access for inspection by M and her agents and breach of a covenant in the lease to keep premises open as a shop or a cafe to visiting members of the public. "Held" appeal allowed under s30(1)(a) on the grounds that the findings of the fact in relation to the disprepair were not sufficiently substantial to justify refusal of a new tenancy.