Klein v London Underground Ltd
Language: English Series: Rating & Valuation Reporter ; [1996] 36 RVR 94-104(11)Publication details: 1996Subject(s): Summary: LT 4 December 1995. In 1981 the claimant took a 12 year lease dated from October 1990 on Arch 265 near Waterloo station and established a gentleman`s hairdressing salon. In 1990 British Rail offered a new lease but the offer was not taken up by the claimant. In 1991 a planning application submitted for the JLE and redevelopment of the subject property was approved. At debated was the amount of compensation payable for the leasehold interest, stock and goodwill of the appellant`s business.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS54927 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 13156-1001 |
LT 4 December 1995. In 1981 the claimant took a 12 year lease dated from October 1990 on Arch 265 near Waterloo station and established a gentleman`s hairdressing salon. In 1990 British Rail offered a new lease but the offer was not taken up by the claimant. In 1991 a planning application submitted for the JLE and redevelopment of the subject property was approved. At debated was the amount of compensation payable for the leasehold interest, stock and goodwill of the appellant`s business.