Image from Google Jackets

Strover v Harrington

Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (8809) 5 March 1988, 61-70(6)Publication details: 1988Subject(s): Summary: ChD 2 December 1987 Action by Mr and Mrs Strover (S), the purchasers of a house, claiming damages for misrepresentation and negligent misstatement against the vendors Mr and Mrs Harrington (H) and damages for negligence against H`s surveyors . H had instructed their estate agents to prepare particulars of sale which amongst other things stated that the house enjoyed mains drainage . S agreed to purchase the house subject to contract. After the solicitors were instructed, H`s agents wrote to S`s solicitors stating that the sale particulars were inaccurate and there was no main drainage. Unfortunately this information was not passed on to S. H however repeated the misrepresentation in a conversation with S`s surveyor and it was confirmed in the survey report that the house enjoyed main drainage. ChD held that S`s surveyors had not been negligent in relying on the vendor`s assertion and stated that, as a professional, the surveyor could only be held liable for negligence if he acted in
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report London Journal article ABS38963 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 13524-1001

ChD 2 December 1987 Action by Mr and Mrs Strover (S), the purchasers of a house, claiming damages for misrepresentation and negligent misstatement against the vendors Mr and Mrs Harrington (H) and damages for negligence against H`s surveyors . H had instructed their estate agents to prepare particulars of sale which amongst other things stated that the house enjoyed mains drainage . S agreed to purchase the house subject to contract. After the solicitors were instructed, H`s agents wrote to S`s solicitors stating that the sale particulars were inaccurate and there was no main drainage. Unfortunately this information was not passed on to S. H however repeated the misrepresentation in a conversation with S`s surveyor and it was confirmed in the survey report that the house enjoyed main drainage. ChD held that S`s surveyors had not been negligent in relying on the vendor`s assertion and stated that, as a professional, the surveyor could only be held liable for negligence if he acted in