Yeandle v Reigate and Banstead BC and another
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; [1996] 14 EG 90-92(3) (6/4/96)Publication details: 1996Subject(s): Summary: CA 16 March 1995. The appellant tenant was granted a tenancy of an agricultural holding in 1968. The tenancy could be determined by landlord or tenant on the 29th day of September in any year provided 12 months notice was given. Following Y`s failure to respond to notices to remedy, the landlords served a notice to quit on 27 July 1992, requiring the tenant to deliver up possession on 28 September 1993. Y argued the notice was invalid as his assignment said 29 September. Appeal dismissed. Notice was valid as the tenancy could be construed to end on the last moment of the 28th or on the first moment of the 29th.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS55016 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 13615-1001 |
CA 16 March 1995. The appellant tenant was granted a tenancy of an agricultural holding in 1968. The tenancy could be determined by landlord or tenant on the 29th day of September in any year provided 12 months notice was given. Following Y`s failure to respond to notices to remedy, the landlords served a notice to quit on 27 July 1992, requiring the tenant to deliver up possession on 28 September 1993. Y argued the notice was invalid as his assignment said 29 September. Appeal dismissed. Notice was valid as the tenancy could be construed to end on the last moment of the 28th or on the first moment of the 29th.