Alternative uses
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; (1992) EGCS 111(1) (8/8/92)Publication details: 1992Subject(s): Summary: "Bloomsbury & Islington Health Authority v SoS Environment and another" QBD 27 July 1992. In a planning appeal the appellants (B) claimed that the inspector refusing permission to redevelop St Peter`s Hospital had not applied the test of whether the council`s favoured alternative of residential conversion was practical and likely to arise in actuality. He was held not to have done so and the appeal, therefore, was allowed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB2832-89 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 1585-1001 |
"Bloomsbury & Islington Health Authority v SoS Environment and another" QBD 27 July 1992. In a planning appeal the appellants (B) claimed that the inspector refusing permission to redevelop St Peter`s Hospital had not applied the test of whether the council`s favoured alternative of residential conversion was practical and likely to arise in actuality. He was held not to have done so and the appeal, therefore, was allowed.