Green belt development
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; 1991 EGCS 93 (1) (12 October 1991)Publication details: 1991Subject(s): Summary: "R v SOS for the Environment ex parte Tesco" QBD 30 August 1991 concerned a proposed superstore development in designated metropolitian green belt. Planning permission had already been granted for three sizeable schemes in the same area. The Inspector`s decision to grant planning permission due to the pre-existing planning permission was quashed by the SOS. In applying "Pehrsson v SOS for Environment" (1990 3 PLR 66), it was held that the SOS had been unreasonable in refusing permission. Hs decision was quashed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB2740-41 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 13940-1001 |
"R v SOS for the Environment ex parte Tesco" QBD 30 August 1991 concerned a proposed superstore development in designated metropolitian green belt. Planning permission had already been granted for three sizeable schemes in the same area. The Inspector`s decision to grant planning permission due to the pre-existing planning permission was quashed by the SOS. In applying "Pehrsson v SOS for Environment" (1990 3 PLR 66), it was held that the SOS had been unreasonable in refusing permission. Hs decision was quashed.