Actual residence not necessary
Language: English Series: Times ; 18 June 1991, 41(1)Publication details: 1991Subject(s): Summary: In Re 1-4 White Row Cottages, Bewerley ChD 23 May 1991, it was held that the word ` dwelling house ` in the context of the provisions of Common Land (Rectification of Registers) Act 1989 as a matter of ordinary language did not necessarily connote actual residence but could include an unoccupied house or one which had become derelict and unfit for human habitation.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2724-41 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 14198-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
In Re 1-4 White Row Cottages, Bewerley ChD 23 May 1991, it was held that the word ` dwelling house ` in the context of the provisions of Common Land (Rectification of Registers) Act 1989 as a matter of ordinary language did not necessarily connote actual residence but could include an unoccupied house or one which had become derelict and unfit for human habitation.