Image from Google Jackets

R.J Williams Le Roi v SoS for the Environment and Salisbury DC

Language: English Series: Journal of Planning and Environment Law ; November 1993, 1033-1049(17)Publication details: 1993Subject(s): Summary: QBD 2 February 1993. Enforcement Notice - buildings on agricultural land - whether 1977 or 1988 GDO - whether date when unauthorised development commenced or date of issue of the enforcement notice - whether use of 1977 or 1988 Orders made a material difference - whether land was agricultural land - purposes of a trade or business - relevance of the scale of the activity - application of relevant test by the Inspector - calculation of the o.4 hectare of land - inclusion of separate parcels - issue estoppel - relevance of earlier enforcement appeal decision letter on the issue of agricultural activity - decision in earlier proceedings against the appellant - burden of proof for issue estoppel on respondent - was the enforcement notice vague or imprecise - reference to building or buildings - appeal allowed. (Headnote from Journal.)
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Journal article London Journal article X1142 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 14926-1001

QBD 2 February 1993. Enforcement Notice - buildings on agricultural land - whether 1977 or 1988 GDO - whether date when unauthorised development commenced or date of issue of the enforcement notice - whether use of 1977 or 1988 Orders made a material difference - whether land was agricultural land - purposes of a trade or business - relevance of the scale of the activity - application of relevant test by the Inspector - calculation of the o.4 hectare of land - inclusion of separate parcels - issue estoppel - relevance of earlier enforcement appeal decision letter on the issue of agricultural activity - decision in earlier proceedings against the appellant - burden of proof for issue estoppel on respondent - was the enforcement notice vague or imprecise - reference to building or buildings - appeal allowed. (Headnote from Journal.)