Image from Google Jackets

Burroughs Day v Bristol City Council

Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (9621) 11 May 1996, 126-137(7)Publication details: 1996Subject(s): Summary: QBD 18 January 1996. The council (B) had refused to grant listed building consent for alterations to a listed building to accommodate a lift shaft within a roof valley. An appeal by BD was dismissed by the SoS, noting that the special interest of the building would be reduced by the loss of r the original characteristic valley gutter shape of the roof. BD were concerned to establish a claim for compensation for refusal of listed building consent under Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 and sought a declaration that works for which consent had been sought did not constitute development within TCPA 1990 s55. Declaration granted. The works did not amount to development within the meaning of the 1990 Act s55(2)(a)(ii).
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report London Journal article ABS55232 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 14993-1001

QBD 18 January 1996. The council (B) had refused to grant listed building consent for alterations to a listed building to accommodate a lift shaft within a roof valley. An appeal by BD was dismissed by the SoS, noting that the special interest of the building would be reduced by the loss of r the original characteristic valley gutter shape of the roof. BD were concerned to establish a claim for compensation for refusal of listed building consent under Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 and sought a declaration that works for which consent had been sought did not constitute development within TCPA 1990 s55. Declaration granted. The works did not amount to development within the meaning of the 1990 Act s55(2)(a)(ii).