Subsidence
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; (1995) EGCS 105(1) (24/6/95)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: "Higgins and another v Hatch & Fielding (a firm)" CA 9 June 1995. Surveyors noted in a survey slight settlement but advised further movement unlikely. Some years later the property owners, made aware of further settlement, pursued a claim only against their insurance company and not against the surveyors as well. CA maintained a reasonable person would have pursued both claims at the same time and upheld that subsequent action against surveyors was statute-barred.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3125-05 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 15070-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB3124-44 Rectification | WB3124-45 Sale of land | WB3124-50 VAT and business purposes | WB3125-05 Subsidence | WB3125-13 Mining subsidence | WB3125-34 Development plan | WB3125-35 Economic considerations |
"Higgins and another v Hatch & Fielding (a firm)" CA 9 June 1995. Surveyors noted in a survey slight settlement but advised further movement unlikely. Some years later the property owners, made aware of further settlement, pursued a claim only against their insurance company and not against the surveyors as well. CA maintained a reasonable person would have pursued both claims at the same time and upheld that subsequent action against surveyors was statute-barred.