RICS Knowledge Services Catalogue Search for 'su:"PLANNING PERMISSION"'

Richmond upon Thames LBC v R. (on the application of Ariyo)

[2024] EWCA Civ 960 Court of Appeal 2024

Tingdene Marinas Ltd v Jaffe

[2023] UKUT 16 (LC), Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), 2023

Adriatic Land 5 Ltd v Long Leaseholders at Hippersley Point

[2023] UKUT 271 (LC) Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), 2023

Wychavon District Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Others

2008

The Bluestone holiday complex judgment: its implications for national parks and local plans

2005

Mezzanine floor outbreak - a practical reality?

By Warren, R..
2005

Findings impress need for telecom regulation

By Gillman, S..
2005

A potential threat to kids' health is no reason to override policy

By Franklin, K..
2005

R (on the application of Richardson and another) v North Yorkshire County Council and others

2004

The significant part of a listed building

By Blackie, N..
2004

Developments that cause a nuisance: the legal significance of the grant of planning permission

By Samuels, A..
2004

Finding a path through the planning maze

By Cousins, D..
2004

Building regulations in brief

By Tricker, Ray.
London Butterworth Heinemann 2004 .
xxii, 705p. 24cm..
0750663111

Planning for gypsy and traveller sites a consultation paper

London ODPM 2004

Speed-up targets killing schemes

2004

Developers urged to involve communities in planning

2004

R (on the application of Cherwell District Council) v First Secretary of State and another

2004

History in the making

By Tomback, D..
2004

A priceless tool if used well

By Wright, G..
2004

Tenuous links can pay off

By Edwards, M..
2004

Montlake and others (as trustees of WASPS Football Club) v Lambert Smith Hampton Group Ltd and another

2004

The quay to successful construction

By Dobie, A..
2004

Rights of appeal in planning

2004

Consent regimes' study

2004

Importance of alternative proposals in development control

By Whale, S..
2004

South Bucks DC and another v Porter (No 2)

2004

Geophysics helps developers avoid temple of doom

By Whittingham, M..
2004

Changing the power landscape

By Bower, A..
2004

Rights of appeal in planning

By Watchman, J..
2004

No room for confusion

By Castorina, G..
2004

Consenting parties

By Waters, B..
2004

Soft fruit creates quandary

By Redman, V..
2004

First SoS, Grant Doe, Gregory Yates and Paul Eames v Chichester DC

2004

Gypsies win

2004

Lough and others v First SoS

2004

Planning hurdles to lower?

By Cousins, D..
2004

Gypsy and traveller sites

2004

R v First Secretary of State and Secretary of State for the Home Department ex p Cherwell DC

2004

Abuse of the planning system

2004

BCO London planning guide

2003

R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Burkett

2003

Hazarding an opinion

By Akenhead, R..
2003

Wandsworth LBC v SoS Transport

2003

The beginning of the end?

By Atkinson, P..
2003

Alderney Estates Ltd v SoS Transport and another

2003

Is it reasonable to appeal?

By O'Dell, S..
2003

Reach for the skies

By Watkins, D..
2003

Focus 2003: MIPIM, France and Benelux

2003

Bown v SoS Transport

2003

Promoting port projects

2003