When is it reasonable to be unreasonable?
Series: CSM ; April 2002, 27(1)Publication details: 2002Subject(s): Summary: Illustrates extent to which a court would be prepared to imply obligations into a development contract, in particular a general obligation for a party to act reasonably. Cites recent case "Liverpool City Council v Walton Group Plc" where the court decided it was not open to claimant to refuse to allow development to proceed on grounds that it now favoured an alternative scheme with a different developer.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS65441 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 117796-1001 |
Illustrates extent to which a court would be prepared to imply obligations into a development contract, in particular a general obligation for a party to act reasonably. Cites recent case "Liverpool City Council v Walton Group Plc" where the court decided it was not open to claimant to refuse to allow development to proceed on grounds that it now favoured an alternative scheme with a different developer.