Trust your Arbitrator?
Language: English Series: New Law Journal ; 137(6322) 11 September 1987, 855-856(2)Publication details: 1987Subject(s): Summary: This article begins by outlining the problems which have been encountered with Arbitration Acts in the past, and looks at how the courts have themselves introduced restrictions as a solution to the number of time-wasting appeals which come to court. On this point, the author describes the Nema case, where the House of Lords laid down guidelines for the criteria to be met if leave to appeal was to be granted, highlighting standard form contracts and special restrictions for influential events. Concludes with a look at some important cases which have had an effect on arbitrations.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS38126 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 8836-1001 |
This article begins by outlining the problems which have been encountered with Arbitration Acts in the past, and looks at how the courts have themselves introduced restrictions as a solution to the number of time-wasting appeals which come to court. On this point, the author describes the Nema case, where the House of Lords laid down guidelines for the criteria to be met if leave to appeal was to be granted, highlighting standard form contracts and special restrictions for influential events. Concludes with a look at some important cases which have had an effect on arbitrations.