Remembrance of damages past
Language: English Series: Contract Journal ; 374(5978) 9 June 1994, 10-11(2)Publication details: 1994Subject(s): Summary: Discusses the differences in laws of limitation, depending on whether claims are made in contract or tort, which give rise to problems for claims for latent damage. With reference to the Limitation Act 1980, the Latent m Damage Act 1986 and the case "Pirelli General Cable Works Ltd v Oscar Faber and Partners 1983", looks at the decisions of "Iron Trade Mutual Insurance Co Ltd v J K Buckenham Ltd " 1990 and "Societe Commerciale de Reassurance v ERAS (International) Ltd" 1992.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS50794 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 48829-1001 |
Discusses the differences in laws of limitation, depending on whether claims are made in contract or tort, which give rise to problems for claims for latent damage. With reference to the Limitation Act 1980, the Latent m Damage Act 1986 and the case "Pirelli General Cable Works Ltd v Oscar Faber and Partners 1983", looks at the decisions of "Iron Trade Mutual Insurance Co Ltd v J K Buckenham Ltd " 1990 and "Societe Commerciale de Reassurance v ERAS (International) Ltd" 1992.