Image from Google Jackets

Monsanto plc v Farris (VO)

Language: English Series: Rating Appeals ; [1998] RA 107-216(56)Publication details: 1998Subject(s): Summary: LT 28 April 1998. A chemical works and premises in Newport, Gwent was assessed by a valuation tribunal at £655,000 RV from 1 April 1990 and £640,000 RV from 30 September 1991. M sought reductions and F sought increases. The parties agreed the valuation should be on the contractors basis and applied the five stage method. They differed in opinion on whether the project would attract a grant, whether there should be adjustments for location or contract size and the approach to adjusting new costs for obsolescence. "Held" the assessment should be reduced to £589,000 from 30 June 1990 and £584,000 from 30 September 1991. The tenant`s alternative and interest foregone as a ceiling on rateable value should not be abandoned, the hypothetical tenant was to be treated as an owner/occupier for stages 1 to 3 inclusive, and a ceiling or maximum rental emerged at stage 4 which could be considered in stage 5 when circumstances peculiar to the hypothetical tenant of rating were to be dealt with.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report London Journal article ABS59105 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 87656-1001

LT 28 April 1998. A chemical works and premises in Newport, Gwent was assessed by a valuation tribunal at £655,000 RV from 1 April 1990 and £640,000 RV from 30 September 1991. M sought reductions and F sought increases. The parties agreed the valuation should be on the contractors basis and applied the five stage method. They differed in opinion on whether the project would attract a grant, whether there should be adjustments for location or contract size and the approach to adjusting new costs for obsolescence. "Held" the assessment should be reduced to £589,000 from 30 June 1990 and £584,000 from 30 September 1991. The tenant`s alternative and interest foregone as a ceiling on rateable value should not be abandoned, the hypothetical tenant was to be treated as an owner/occupier for stages 1 to 3 inclusive, and a ceiling or maximum rental emerged at stage 4 which could be considered in stage 5 when circumstances peculiar to the hypothetical tenant of rating were to be dealt with.