The enforceability of options over land
Series: EMIS Property Service ; 2(12) December 2004, 3-5(3)Publication details: 2004Subject(s):- LAW OF PROPERTY (MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) ACT 1989
- SPIRO V GLENCROWN PROPERTIES
- LAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925
- LAND CHARGES ACT 1972
- HOLLINGTON BROS LTD V RHODES
- MIDLAND BANK TRUST CO LTD V GREEN
- WEBB V POLLMOUNT LTD
- LAND REGISTRATION ACT 2002
- LANDLORD AND TENANTS (COVENANTS) ACT 1995
- LAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1922
- WOODALL V CLIFTON
- GRIFFITH V PELTON
- PERPETUITIES AND ACCUMULATIONS ACT 1964
- LAND REGISTRATION ACT 1925
- LEASE RENEWAL
- REVERSION
- PROPERTY
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS68671 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 128624-1001 |
Options are granted in a variety of circumstances. Between landlords and tenants options to renew leases and options to purchase the reversion are common and developers often enter into options over freeholds pending the results of planning applications. The enforceability of options depends upon following the correct formalities for creation and protecting them by registration against the grantor's title. This article looks at both of these issues in relation to options relating to freeholds and leaseholds. [Taken from journal abstract].