| 000 | 00971cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3109-07 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1995 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u15370 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aArchitects` fees | ||
| 260 | _c1995 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v(1995) EGCS 24(1) (25/2/95) |
||
| 520 | _a"Munkenbeck & Marshall v McAlpine" CA 15 February 1995. In a claim by architects for unpaid fees for alteration work to a flat, costs were awarded on an indemnity basis against the defendant, who claimed that the work was not finished when the architects` services were terminated so fees should be charged on a lower basis. | ||
| 650 | _aALTERATIONS | ||
| 650 | _aARCHITECTS | ||
| 650 | _aFEES | ||
| 650 | _aINDEMNITY BASIS | ||
| 650 | _aUNPAID FEES | ||
| 690 | _aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CASE LAW | ||
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c10072 _d10072 |
||