000			01195cam a2200205 4500
001			WB3712-28
008			000000n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u111518
245			_aPlanning permission
260			_c2001
490			_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v[2001] EGCS 34(1) (17/03/01)
520			_a"R v Restormel BC, ex parte Corbett" CA 2 March 2001. L& P Property Ltd were granted 3 outline planning permissions enabling them to erect buildings for non-food retail use. As a result of an inquiry the grants of planning permission were found to be wrong as they conflicted with development plan policies. It was recommended that permission be modified by removing non-food retail use from the matters permitted enabling L&P to claim compensation. The appellant councillor applied to have this quashed. Held, the council had acted unlawfully in granting the 1997 permission and refused to quash it. The appellant appealed.
590			_aWB
650			_aPLANNING PERMISSION
650			_aNEW DEVELOPMENT
650			_aRETAIL USE
650			_aR V RESTORMEL BC EX P CORBETT
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
942			_n0
999			_c101251 _d101251