000			01605cam a2200229 4500
001			X116027
008			011102n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u116027
245			_aActionstrength Ltd v International Glass Engineering InGl En SpA and another
260			_c2001
490			_aConstruction Industry Law Letter _v[2001] CILL 1793-1795(3)
520			_aCA 10 October 2001. The appellant (A) entered into a labour only subcontract with the respondent's (S) main contract (I), which owed A substantial sums when it was subsequently wound up. A alleged that it had only continued to supply labour after entering into an oral agreement that S would ensure it would be paid. S contended that this was a guarantee and that, as there was no written record, the Statute of Frauds 1677 s4 meant that it could not be enforced. "Held" : The appeal was dismissed. If, however, I had been a party to the arrangement it might have been possible to read it as facilitating the payment of I'd debts rather than meeting them after I had defaulted. View judgment at www.courtservice.gov.uk.
590			_aABS
650			_aACTIONSTRENGTH LTD V INTERNATIONAL GLASS ENGINEERING INGL EN SPA AND ANOTHER
650			_aSUBCONTRACTORS
650			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS
650			_aORAL AGREEMENTS
650			_aSTATUTE OF FRAUDS 1677 S4
690			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS
856			_uhttps://porch.ccta.gov.uk/courtser/judgements.nsf/Search/8AA4A1CDF19D173A80256AE2003C84ED?OpenDocument _vView judgment on the Court Service website...
942			_n0
999			_c101805 _d101805