| 000 | 01443cab a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS51220 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u15516 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aTrafalgar House Construction (Regions) Limited v General Surety and Guarantee Company Limited | ||
| 260 | _c1994 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aConstruction Law Journal _v(1994) 10 CLJ 240-246(7) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 22 February 1994. In 1989 T entered into a building contract to construct a leisure complex. The groundworks were subcontracted and they obtained a bond from the subcontractors equal to 10% of the subcontract value. Before they completed the groundwork the subcontractors went into receivership and T finished the work. T commenced proceedings against G the guarantor of the bond for the sum of £101,285. The court held that T should receive that sum on the grounds that they was no arguable defence. G appealed but this was dismissed on the grounds that the obligation of the surety arose when called upon to pay any damages resulting from the subcontractors failure to perform. | ||
| 650 | _aCONDITIONAL BONDS | ||
| 650 |
_aInsolvency _96247 |
||
| 650 | _aLEISURE COMPLEX | ||
| 650 | _aON-DEFAULT BONDS | ||
| 650 | _aON-DEMAND BONDS | ||
| 650 | _aPERFORMANCE BONDS | ||
| 650 | _aSURETIES | ||
| 650 | _aSURETY BOND | ||
| 690 | _aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c10185 _d10185 |
||