000			01714cam a2200241 4500
008			020513n2002 000 0 eng u
020			_a1842191020
035			_a(Sirsi) u117934
050			_a346.41043
110			_aRoyal Institution of Chartered Surveyors _bPolicy Unit _94169
245			_aWhose property is it anyway? A review of the use of local authority property by third parties
260			_aLondon _bRICS _c2002
300			_a53p. _c30cm.
350			_a0
520			_aA review of the use of local authority property by third-parties which suggests that few councils have developed robust arrangements for dealing with third-party occupation. Argues that if local authorities are to avoid entering into arrangements which will be to the detriment of their portfolio they need to consider formalising third-party arrangements, charging open market rents where possible, the incorporation capital expenditure into agreements, co-ordination of all agreements within each authority, the nature of the agreements based on the period and extent of occupation, separating property agreements from wider service agreements, incorporated the total cost of occupancy into agreements, the involvement of individuals with property expertise in negotiations, and that third-party arrangements do not unduly impact the authorities future flexibility. View at www.rics.org.
650			_aTENANCY AGREEMENTS
650			_aUNITARY AUTHORITIES
650			_aLOCAL AUTHORITIES
690			_aPROPERTY MANAGEMENT _96262
710			_aRoyal Institution of Chartered Surveyors _94900
856			_uhttps://www.rics.org/Global/Downloads/WhosePropertyAnyway.pdf _zView the report on the RICS website...
942			_n0
999			_c102066 _d102066