| 000 | 01395cam a2200193 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS65597 | ||
| 008 | 020527n2002 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u118429 | ||
| 245 | _aBalfour Beatty Construction Ltd v The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Lambeth | ||
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 490 |
_aConstruction Industry Law Letter _v[2002] CILL 1873-1876(4) |
||
| 520 | _aTCC 12 April 2002. The claimant (B) applied for summary judgement to enforce an adjudicator's decision that it was entitled to a substantial extension of time and therefore repayment of certain liquidated and ascertained damages. M argued that the adjudicator had not acted impartially, had not compiled with the principles of natural justice, and had acted in breach of contract and without jurisdiction. "Held": the courts refused to grant summary judgement on the grounds that the adjudicator had failed to give notice of the approach he intended to take. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATORS | ||
| 650 | _aBALFOUR BEATTY CONSTRUCTION LTD V LAMBETH B C | ||
| 690 |
_aDispute resolution _96236 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c102141 _d102141 |
||