000			01382cam a2200229 4500
001
008			020128n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u118782
245			_aSmith (as Administrator of Cosslett Contractors) v Bridgend County Borough Council
260			_c2002
490			_aBuilding Law Reports _v[2002] 4 BLR 160-173(14)
520			_aHL 8 November 2001. S appealed against a CA ruling that a claim for damages brought by S on the grounds that B giving consent to the removal of plant from a site after C had gone into administration amounted to the tort of conversion had failed. "Held": the appeal was allowed, the judgement implying that the ICE Condition 5th ed. cl. 63 do not transfer title to the employer create a 'floating charge' that is ineffective unless registered under the Companies Act 1985 s395. the full judgement id given on the HL website at http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200102/ldjudgmt/jd011108/smith-1.htm.
590			_aABS
650			_aICE FORMS OF CONTRACT
650			_aSMITH (ADMINISTRATOR OF COSLETT LTD (CONTRACTORS)) V BRIDGEND CBC
650			_aOWNERSHIP
650			_aTRANSFER OF TITLE
650			_aPLANT AND MACHINERY
690			_aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CONTRACTS-OTHER CONTRACTS
856			_uhttps://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200102/ldjudgmt/jd011108/smith-1.htm
942			_n0
999			_c102176 _d102176