000			01493cab a2200277 4500
001			ABS55323
008			090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u15757
041			_aeng
245			_aNorman and another v DTp
260			_c1996
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[1996] 24 EG 150-155 (6)
520			_aLT 20 February 1996. The owners of a cottage (N) served a blight notice on the respondent authority (X) requiring them to acquire their interest in the property. N claimed that although the draft compulsory purchase order only covered the subsoil of the adjoining highway, the subsoil was part of their hereditament and therefore X had to acquire the whole property. X served a counternotice claiming that the hereditament did not include the highway subsoil. "Decision" X`s objection was not well founded. The subsoil was part of the hereditament. Accordingly, the blight notice was valid and X was required to acquire the cottage and the subsoil.
650			_aBLIGHT NOTICE
650			_aDRAFT COMPULSORY PURCHASE ORDER
650			_aHEREDITAMENTS
650			_aHIGHWAY SUBSOIL
650			_aNORMAN AND ANOTHER V DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT
650			_aNOTICE TO TREAT
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S171(1)
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 SCHED 13
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-COMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c10362 _d10362