| 000 | 01440cam a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L128484 | ||
| 002 | 7909 | ||
| 008 | 050110n2005 000 0 eng u | ||
| 020 | _a0750661747 | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u128484 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 050 |
_a690 _c18 |
||
| 245 | _aAssessing building performance | ||
| 260 |
_aOxford _bElsevier Butterworth Heinemann _c2005 |
||
| 300 |
_axx, 243p. _c25cm. |
||
| 350 | _a34.99 | ||
| 520 | _aThe building performance evaluation framework emphasizes an evaluative stance throughout the six phases of the building delivery and life cycle: (1) strategic planning/needs analysis; (2) program review; (3) design review; (4) post-construction evaluation/review; (5) post-occupancy evaluation; and, (6) facilities management review/adaptive reuse. The lessons learned from positive and negative building performance are fed into future building delivery cycles. The case studies illustrate how this basic methodology has been adapted to a range of cultural contexts, and indicates the positive results of building performance assessment in a wide range of situations. Includes case studies from Brazil, Israel, Japan, and Netherlands. | ||
| 590 | _aIKA070605 | ||
| 650 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-CONSTRUCTION DESIGN | ||
| 650 | _aBUILDING PERFORMANCE | ||
| 650 | _aEVALUATION | ||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT | ||
| 700 | _aPreiser, Wolfgang F. E. | ||
| 700 | _aVischer, Jacqueline C. | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c103926 _d103926 |
||