000			01639cab a2200313 4500
001			ABS55337
008			090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u15840
041			_aeng
245			_aR v Department of Trade and Industry ex p. Healaugh Farms
260			_c1996
350			_a0
490			_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v[1996] 72 P&CR 1-9(5)
520			_aQBD 13 December 1995. H owned land over which the National Grid proposed to construct new overhead powerlines. N applied to SoS Trade and Industry under the Electricity Act 1989 Para6 Sch4 for a compulsory wayleave. The DTI inspector fell ill after initial hearing and H sought assurance that SoS would pay his costs arising from the aborted hearing. SoS replied that there was no provision for any party to a wayleave to pay the costs of another. H applied for judicial review. "Held" that a hearing was an inquiry for the Tribunal and Inquiries Act 1971 and not the Electricity Act 1989 s62. There was no reason why an objector to compulsory wayleave proceedings should be worse off than objectors in any other proceedings. Application dismissed.
650			_aCompulsory purchase _96228
650			_aCOMPULSORY WAYLEAVE
650			_aELECTRICITY ACT 1989
650			_aLOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1972 S250
650			_aLOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1972
650			_aNATIONAL GRID
650			_aPOWER LINES
650			_aPUBLIC INQUIRY
650			_aR V DTI EX P HEALAUGH FARMS
650			_aTRIBUNAL AND INQUIRIES ACT 1971
650			_aWAYLEAVES
690			_aHIGHWAYS AND RIGHTS OF WAY-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c10425 _d10425