000			01196cab a2200205 4500
001			X1256
008			090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u15845
041			_aeng
245			_aP.G. Vallance Ltd v SoS for the Environment and Mole Valley DC
260			_c1994
350			_a0
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v1994 JPL 50-55(6)
520			_aQBD 13 October 1992. Enforcement notice - leave to appeal - collection of aircraft in green belt site - was there a point of law? - detailed consideration of decison letter - wording was open to critism but it did not amount to a misdirection such as would amount to a point of law - relevance of `the proviso` as used in the criminal context - Order 55 (rule7(7)) - difference between criminal appeals against a trial on indictment and planning appeals - single judge not bound to grant leave even if it was in circumstances where it was plain that as regards the decision as a whole no substantial wrong had benn occaisioned. (Headnote from journal)
650			_aENFORCEMENT NOTICE
650			_aGREEN BELT
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c10429 _d10429