| 000 | 01097cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | X1262 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u15875 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aObjection to plans | ||
| 260 | _c1993 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v(1993) EGCS 216(1) (8/1/94) |
||
| 520 | _a" R v Southwark LBC, ex parte Daniel Davies & Co" QBD 3 December 1993. Objectors to development proposals claimed they had had little warning of the meeting with the planning subcommittee and of planning officers` recommendation; also that the subcommittee had not produced earlier a draft section 106 agreement, which was decided on at the meeting. Held that the subcommittee had not acted illegally, unfairly or with indecent haste. | ||
| 650 | _aOBJECTIONS | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING APPLICATIONS | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING SUBCOMMITTEE | ||
| 650 | _aPROCEDURE | ||
| 650 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S106 | ||
| 650 | _aSTUDENT ACCOMMODATION | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c10451 _d10451 |
||