000			01492cab a2200265 4500
001			ABS55345
008			090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u15882
041			_aeng
245			_aCheltenham & Gloucester Building Society v Christina Norgan
260			_c1996
350			_a0
490			_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v[1996] 72 P&CR 47-61(8)
520			_aCA 5 December 1995. N obtained a £90,000 mortgage from C`s predecessor. Terms of mortgage were that the principal sum would be repaid at the expiration of a 22 year term. N had difficulty meeting the monthly interest installments and arrears in excess of £14,000 accrued. A possession order was suspended twice to enable N to refinance the mortgage. In 1993, C applied again to issue the warrant. N`s appeal to County Court dismissed. On appeal to CA< N argued that the `reasonable period` for the purposes of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 s36 should be the term of the mortgage. "Held" logic of the legislation required the Court to take as it`s starting point the full term of the mortgage. Appeal allowed.
650			_aADMINISTRAITON OF JUSTICE ACT 1970 S36
650			_aADMINISTRAITON OF JUSTICE ACT 1970
650			_aCHELTENHAM & GLOUCESTER BUILDING SOCIETY V CHRISTINA NORGAN
650			_aMORTGAGE ARREARS
650			_aMORTGAGES
650			_aPOSSESSION ORDER
650			_aREASONABLE PERIOD
690			_aHOUSING-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c10456 _d10456