000			01450cab a2200193 4500
001			##L131337
008			050727n2005 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u131337
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aCase news _bFelber Jucker and Co v Sabreleague Ltd
260			_c2005
490		0	_aProperty Week _v70(41) 14 October 2005, 83(1)
520			_aThe case (ChD, [2005] PLSCS 162) centred around compensation payable to the tenant (F) following the landlord serving notice opposing renewal of the lease. S served notice to F on the grounds that it wanted to redevelop the property. S subsequently changed its mind and notified the F that it did not need to vacate the property. F argued that a Section 25 notice cannot be withdrawn and amended and was still entitled to vacate and received statutory compensation of £94 000. S claimed that the law had been amended by in 2004. S applied to oppose the renewal of the tenancy, knowing it would fail which in turn would prevent F from receiving its statutory compensation. "Held": the action was struck out as an abuse of the court, and that the 2004 changes were not intended to change the rules regarding compensation.
590			_aIKA251005
650	2	4	_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 PART II
650	2	4	_aFELBER JUCKER AND CO LTD V SABRELEAGUE LTD
690			_aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-LEASEHOLD COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
999			_c104717 _d104717