000			01765cam a2200253 4500
001			##L133076
008			060407n2006 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u133076
041	0		_aeng
050	0	4	_a306.1 $2 18
100	1		_aWatson, Jon
245	0	0	_aUnderstanding planning gain _bwhat works?
260			_aYork _bJoseph Rowntree Foundation _c2006
520			_aInvestigates the outcomes from s106 schemes in terms of both value for money and building standards and quality and also identifies lessons from the procurement process which could form the basis of good practice guidance. Evaluates the housing provided through eight different planning agreements in Leeds and York and finds that most schemes comprised off-the-shelf purchases of homes built by private house builders. Suggests that the housing associations acquiring them were more concerned with doing the deal than ensuring that the homes met the quality and space standards required when receiving Housing Corporation funding. Sees registered social landlords as being in a relatively weak position when negotiating deals because of differences in their culture and negotiating styles compared with the private sector. The study also suggests a number of impediments to the successful operation of planning gain policy.
590			_aIKA110406, KA
650	2	4	_aPLANNING GAIN
650	2	4	_aPLANNING GAIN SUPPLEMENT
650	2	4	_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S106
650	2	4	_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S106
650			_aAffordable housing _96215
690			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.jrf.org.uk/pressroom/releases/090306.asp _zView the study free of charge at www.jrf.org.uk...
942			_n0
999			_c105321 _d105321