000			01540cab a2200205 4500
001			ABS39337
008			090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u16016
041			_aeng
245			_aAshburn Anstalt v Arnold and another (No 2)
260			_c1988
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(8823) 11 June 1988, 128-132(3)
520			_aCA 25 February 1988. CA had given judgment on a number of matters in this case on 27 October 1987, see Abstract 38589. At the time it was agreed that further argument on consequential matters should be heard, which led to the present proceedings. The defendants (T) are occupiers of shop premises under the terms of a 1973 agreement. The previous decision established that the agreement created a lease not a licence, in favour of T and that certain provisions in clause 6 of the agreement constituted an overriding interest . The provisions were never registered as an estate contract , and so T had no enforceable rights in respect of clause 6, except such as were derived from their overriding interest. The plaintiffs (L) have planning permission to develop the area. At issue is whether, in the absence of an undertaking by L to offer to T a lease of a shop elsewhere on the development, T would be entitled a) to restrain L from proceeding with a development scheme which did not provide suit
650			_aLAND REGISTRATION ACT 1925
650			_aMATLODGE LTD
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c10534 _d10534