000			01204cab a2200265 4500
001			X1288
008			090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u16017
041			_aeng
245			_aMurphy v SoS Wales and Torfaen BC
260			_c1994
350			_a0
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v(1994) JPEL 156-161(6)
520			_aQBD 20 October 1992. Dwelling-house extension - built in excess of planning permission - significant differences not de minimus - consideration of Pehrsson and Top Deck Holdings - imposition of condition - should inspector have considered this where no such condition had been canvassed - PPG2 para 16 created an exception to the general rule laid down in Top Deck, but in this case the Inspector had not obligation to consider the imposition of a condition. (Case headnote)
650			_aDIMENSIONS
650			_aEXTENSION
650			_aPEHRSSON V SOS ENVIRONMENT
650			_aPLANNING PERMISSION
650			_aPLANNING POLICY GUIDANCE NOTE 2 (GREEN BELTS)
650			_aSIZE
650			_aTOP DECK HOLDINGS LTD V SOS ENVIRONMENT
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c10535 _d10535