| 000 | 00990cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2738-50 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u1822 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aInappropriate development in the Green Belt | ||
| 260 | _c1991 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aIndependent _v2 October 1991, 27(1) |
||
| 520 | _aIn "R v SoS for the Environment ex parte Tesco", QBD 30 August 1991, it was held that on an application for planning permission for an inappropriate development in a Green Belt, the fact that planning permission had been already been granted for another inappropriate development of at least the same impact on the Green Belt amounted, on the facts, to a very special circumstance justifying the grant of permission. | ||
| 650 | _aGREEN BELT | ||
| 650 | _aINAPPROPRIATE DEVELOPMENT | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING PERMISSION | ||
| 650 | _aSUPERSTORES | ||
| 690 | _aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c1054 _d1054 |
||