000			01511cab a2200193 4500
001			ABS39341
008			090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u16042
041			_aeng
245			_aTollbench Ltd v Plymouth City Council
260			_c1988
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(8823) 11 June 1988, 132-138(4)
520			_aCA 3 March 1988. Appeal by landlords (P) against cc decision in favour of tenants (T), granting a declaration that P`s refusal of consent to a proposed change of use r was unreasonable. The lease contains covenants on the part of T not to use the premises other than as a shop without the consent of P. Existing use was as a restaurant and T wished to change the use to that of a self-service snack restaurant with amusement facilities. P, who were also the planning and licensing authority, granted planning permission for the proposed change of use and a gaming licence, but as landlord refused consent to the change. Cc judge made a declaration in favour of T, finding that P had reached their decision in an unreasonable way. P appealed. CA held that cc judge had fallen into error. When determining whether a refusal of consent is reasonable two questions must be considered : 1) the landlord`s reason for refusal - the onus being on the tenant to show the reason and that it is unreasonable a
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 S53
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c10550 _d10550