000			01641cab a2200229 4500
001			X1294
008			090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u16052
041			_aeng
245			_aTesco Stores Ltd v SOS Environment and West Oxfordshire DC and Tarmac Provincial Properties Ltd
260			_c1994
350			_a0
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v1994 JPL 227-242(16)
520			_aRetail Food Stores - policies in emerging local plan - access arrangements - impact on traffic - applicant`s offer of funding for highway improvements - link between development of food store and highway funding - local plan Inspector`s preference for site of one food store and Council`s acceptance - whether part of local development plan process - weight to be accorded to such preference planning obligations Circular 16/91 paras B8 and B9 - SoS granted planning permission for a site different to that preferred by local plan inspector and refused the application by Tesco - appeal to High Court decision quashed SoS entitled to give little weight to the local plan inspector`s preference after having expressly considered it - use and application of tests in Annex B of Circular 16/91 not appropriate in the case where an offer from a proposed developer is under consideration - tests of B8 and B9 are not the legal test of materiality R v Plymouth CC applied - there was a fair and reasonabl
650			_aCIRCULAR 16/91
650			_aHIGHWAYS
650			_aR V PLYMOUTH CITY COUNCIL
650			_aRETAIL DEVELOPMENT
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c10557 _d10557