| 000 | 01236cab a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS55379 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u16066 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aLong v Tower Hamlets LBC | ||
| 260 | _c1996 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aAll England Law Reports _v(1996) 2 All ER 683-704 (11) |
||
| 520 | _aChD 20 March 1996. L contended that T`s right of action was statute-barred by the 12 year limitation period of the Limitation Act 1980 s15(1). T contended that the tenancy document was a `lease in writing` and that the limitation period began in 1984 when a notice to quit was served on L. "Held" that a written document was not a lease in writing but merely evidenced the existence of a lease and it could take effect a lease only if it operated in accordance with the Law of Property Act s54, which was not the case in this instance. Appeal allowed. | ||
| 650 | _aADVERSE POSSESSION | ||
| 650 | _aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S54 | ||
| 650 | _aLIMITATION ACT 1980 S15(1) | ||
| 650 | _aLIMITATION PERIOD | ||
| 650 | _aLONG V TOWER HAMLETS LBC | ||
| 650 | _aNOTICE TO QUIT | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c10565 _d10565 |
||