| 000 | 01161cam a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ##L135025 | ||
| 008 | 060920n2006 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u135025 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 110 | 2 |
_aKnight Frank _91530 |
|
| 245 | 0 | 0 |
_aPlanning gain supplement audit _bfinal report |
| 260 |
_aLondon _bKnight Frank _c2006 |
||
| 520 | _aA report prepared for the British Property Federation, the Confederation of British Industry, the Home Builders Federation and RICS which sought to examine how Planning Gain Supplement (PGS) would operate in practice. Eighteen case studies were examined to judge the impact of PGS, and interviews were carried out with developers and landowners. The research found that the biggest impact would be on small developments which could incur extra costs through PGS. | ||
| 590 | _aIKA031006 NTK | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aPLANNING GAIN SUPPLEMENT |
| 651 | 4 |
_aEngland _y886- |
|
| 690 | _aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-PLANNING REFORM | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://www.bpf.org.uk/en/files/bpf_documents/planning/Planning_gain_audit.pdf _zView the report free of charge at www.bpf.org.uk... |
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c105892 _d105892 |
||