000			01534cab a2200253 4500
001			ABS55403
008			090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u16200
041			_aeng
245			_aNahlis, Dickey and Morris v SoS Environment, RB Kensington and Chelsea, Southside Leisure Ltd and Maiden Outdoor Advertising Ltd
260			_c1996
350			_a0
490			_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v[1996] 71 P&CR 553-565(7)
520			_aQBD 23 November 1995. Royal Borough of Kensigton and Chelsea (X) had served discontinuance notices requiring use of a building for an advertising hoarding. Plaintiff solicitors (N) now practised from a different site, although they remained freehold owners of the premises. X sent nine identical notices to alternative addresses but the notices sent to N at the premises concerned were returned marked addressee unknown. An appeal against the notices on the merits only was rejected by SoS Environment."Held" that applicants had not been prejudiced by the convolutions of service or non- service or by the fact that SoS letter didn't carry a date. Application dismissed.
650			_aADVERTISING HOARDINGS
650			_aDISCONTINUANCE NOTICE
650			_aNAHLIS, DICKEY AND MORRIS V SOS ENVIRONMENT AND OTHERS
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S288
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S329
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c10645 _d10645