000			01871cam a22002175a 4500
001			L137934
008			070509E2007 xxk f w 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u137934
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aLevel Properties Ltd v Balls Brothers Ltd _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2007
520			_a[2007] EWHC 744 (Ch), 30 March 2007. The defendant sub tenant had taken assignment of a lease. The rent review clause stated that on review the rent was the higher of the passing rent and the open market yearly rent. The review was referred to the independent expert second defendant for determination. Clause 3.13 of the lease stated that the landlord's written licence to assign the whole of the demised premises should not be unreasonably withheld, subject to the landlord's entitlement to require a surety in certain circumstances. "Held": clause 3.13 set out the agreement of the parties as to what alienations were not absolutely prohibited and could be made with consent and accordingly restrict the circumstances in which a tenant could properly apply for consent to an assignment. It did not set out a condition which the landlord could impose for the giving of consent to an assignment nor did it set out a circumstance in which a refusal of consent was deemed to be reasonable. It did not set out a condition which the landlord could impose for the giving of consent to an assignment nor did it set out a circumstance in which a refusal of consent was deemed to be reasonable.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aLEVEL PROPERTIES V BALL BROTHERS
650	2	4	_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1927
650	2	4	_aNATIONAL GRID CO V M25 GROUP LTD
651		4	_aEngland _y886-
690			_aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2007/744.html _zView the item free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c106939 _d106939