000			01691cam a22002175a 4500
001			L138243
008			070524e2007 xxk f 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u138243
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aLay and others v. Drexler and others _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2007
520			_a[2007] EWCA Civ 464, 18 May 2007. The appellant landlords appealed against a decision to make no order for costs following the dismissal of a claim for the grant of a new tenancy. The respondent tenants held a five-year lease of business premises, and before it expired they indicated that they were considering renewing. The respondent tenants failed to respond to a draft new lease put forward by the appellant landlords, and filed an acknowledgement of service opposing its terms. The amount of interim rent if the tenants vacated was agreed, and before trial the tenants gave notice to the court that they no longer wanted a new lease. At a hearing regarding costs, the judge did not make an order as to costs on the basis that the proceedings had been compromised. "Held": The judge had been wrong to conclude that the case amounted to a compromise, and in particular, a compromise of the tenants' claim for a new lease.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aLAY AND OTHERS V DREXLER AND OTHERS
650	2	4	_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 S29
650	2	4	_aREGULATORY REFORM (BUSINESS TENANCIES) (ENGLAND AND WALES) ORDER 2003
651		4	_aEngland _y886-
690			_aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-COMMERCIAL LEASES
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2007/464.html _zView the item free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c107074 _d107074