000			01429cam a22002175a 4500
001			L138262
008			070525e2007 xxk f 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u138262
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aNicholson v. Leasehold Valuation Tribunal for the Midlands Rent Assessment Panel _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2007
520			_aLRA 29 2006, 08 January 2007. Appeal by the landlords of a flat against a decision of the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal (LVT) which determined the premium to be paid for a new lease of the flat. The landlords applied for permission to appeal on the deferment rate only. Before the LVT there was agreement between the valuers that the yield rate for capitalising the ground rent was the same as the deferment rate. In their valuation the LVT adopted the same rate for capitalising the ground rent as for the deferment rate. "Held": on the basis of Cadogan v Sportelli there was no reason for taking deferment rate other than 5%.
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aARBIB V EARL CADOGAN
650	2	4	_aEARL CADOGAN AND ANOTHER V SPORTELLI AND ANOTHER
650	2	4	_aLEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES-LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.landstribunal.gov.uk/aspx/view.aspx?id=415 _zView the item free of charge at www.landstribunal.gov.uk...
942			_n0
999			_c107092 _d107092