000			01346cad a22002175a 4500
001			L138451
008			070606s2007 xxk f l000 0 eng d
020			_a9781847810274
035			_a(Sirsi) u138451
041	0		_aeng
050	0	4	_a635.977 $2 22
110	1		_aLondon Assembly _bEnvironment Committee _95217
245	0	0	_aChainsaw massacre _ba review of London's street trees _h[electronic resource]
260			_aLondon _bGreater London Authority _c2007
520			_aInvestigates the rate of loss of city trees within London. Finds that overall, boroughs have planted more trees than they felled. However the gains are not evenly spread. A third of London boroughs, including Croydon and Harrow, have experienced net loss. Many trees are felled because of subsidence claims. These claims are often not substantially investigated and many fellings are erroneous. Recommends greater monitoring of tree population, better quality investigation into subsidence claims, tree replacement schemes and best practice guidelines. Considers the funding implications of this.
590			_aKA
651		4	_aLONDON
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
856	4	8	_uhttps://legacy.london.gov.uk/assembly/reports/environment/chainsaw-massacre.pdf _zView the item free of charge at www.london.gov.uk
942			_n0
999			_c107172 _d107172