000			01911cad a22002415a 4500
001			L142118
008			080124e20071215xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u142118
041	0		_aeng
050	0	4	_a346.4104346 $2 18
245	0	0	_aHolding and Management (Solitaire) Ltd _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2007
520			_aLRX 138 2006, 26 October 2007. Considers how the vertical division of a building is relevant to the right to manage. The landlord of premises within a building (H) appealed against a leasehold valuation tribunal decision that the respondent company (R) held the right to manage his premises. H argued that his premises did not constitute a vertical division of the building contrary to the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 s72(3)(a). H argued there was nothing in the Act giving the Tribunal discretion to determine the right to manage and submitted that the vertical severance produced by did not represent a self-contained part of the building. "Held": The tribunal had erred in determining the issue upon whether the area outside a line drawn vertically through the building was minimal, a test based on the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 which was created for a different purpose. The question was whether the premises was physically a division of the building, creating self-contained premises for the purposes of the 2002 Act. The premises did not create such an area. R was not entitled to manage H's premises. Appeal allowed.
521	2		_aExpert
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aHOLDING AND MANAGEMENT (SOLITAIRE) LTD
650	2	4	_aLEASEHOLD REFORM ACT 1967
650	2	4	_aCOMMONHOLD AND LEASEHOLD REFORM ACT 2002 S72
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.landstribunal.gov.uk/aspx/view.aspx?id=466 _zView the item free of charge at www.landstribunal.gov.uk...
942			_n0
999			_c107846 _d107846