000			01928cad a22002175a 4500
001			L143865
008			080604e20080320xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u143865
041	0		_aeng
050	0	4	_a346.4104342 $2 18
245	0	0	_aKing and others v Udlaw Ltd _h[electronic resource]
260			_aLondon _bLands Tribunal _c2008
520			_aLRX/186/2006, 20 March 2008. Considered whether a bungalow used for providing holiday accommodation was a dwelling for the purposes of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s18. The appellant (K) was the leasehold owner and occupier of a holiday bungalow on a park owned by the respondent freeholder (U). K was covenanted to pay service charges to U. U applied to the tribunal for determination of the level of charges. The tribunal ruled that it was unable to determine this as holiday accommodation was not governed by the Act. K appealed, arguing established common ground between K and U that the bungalow provided all the facilities and amenities required for long-term occupation, and K was in fact resident for significant periods of the year. "Held": The issue to be determined was whether the bungalow constituted a dwelling. Planning law based the distinction on the facilities required for daily living, while housing and rent legislation required that it be occupied as a home. Planning legislation concerned a separate area of law. K was under covenant that the bungalow was not his home, therefore it could not be considered a dwelling within the meaning of the Act. Appeal dismissed.
521	2		_aAdvanced
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aKING AND OTHERS V LUDLAW LTD
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL SERVICE CHARGES
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.landstribunal.gov.uk/Aspx/view.aspx?id=503 _zView the judgment free of charge at www.landstribunal.gov.uk...
942			_n0
999			_c108296 _d108296