000			01974cam a22002535a 4500
001			L145365
008			081001s2007 xxkdo f ms 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u145365
041	0		_aeng
050	0	4	_a346.410435
100	1		_aDefoe, Peter Stanley
245	0	4	_aThe validity of daylight calculations in rights to light cases
260			_aCambridge _bAnglia Ruskin University _c2007
300			_axiv, 272p. _bill. _c30cm.
505	2		_aThe legal background -- The development of the present methodologies -- Existing methods and available alternatives -- How much light is needed and how much is available? -- Designing the research project -- Research details and results -- Analysis of results -- Conclusions and recommendations
505	2		_aAppendices: photometric definitions; discussion on the party wall and rights to light forum; accuracy and tolerances of measuring equipment; experimental data sheet; was Waldrum wrong?; the validity of daylight calculations in rights to light cases; Waldrum and CIE Lambert diagram tables
520			_aThis doctoral thesis proposes a need to re-evaluate the basis of assessment of the sufficiency of daylight in rights to light cases where a reduction or loss of daylight may lead to a claim for damages. The author challenges the established methodology for calculating reductions and seeks to explore the options for viable alternatives that are suitable for both the negotiation of compensation and advising the court. The original research into the subject is repeated and compared against other techniques to help develop a new model of calculation that will allow surveyors to offer the most accurate advice possible to interested parties. Contains appendices and detailed statistical analysis.
521			_aAdvanced
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aRIGHTS TO LIGHT
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-PROPERTY MANAGEMENT-EASEMENTS-RIGHTS TO LIGHT DETERMINATION
942			_n0
999			_c108770 _d108770