| 000 | 00887cab a2200193 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2548-25 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u16520 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aTrue construction of rent review clause | ||
| 260 | _c1989 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aChartered Surveyor Weekly _vvol 29 no 10 7/12/89 p78(2) |
||
| 520 | _aArnold and others v National Westminster Bank plc , CA 8 November 1989, continues the saga of the "Arthur Young" case , (National Westminster Bank plc v Arthur Young McClelland Moores & Co ), Abstract 34949, which concerned the construction of a rent review clause of a sub-underlease of business premises. The bank`s attempt to strike out the tenant`s statement of claim to re-litigate failed. | ||
| 650 | _aCONSTRUCTION OF CLAUSE | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c10884 _d10884 |
||