000			02033cad a22002655a 4500
001			L146365
008			090112e20081216xxk f v 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u146365
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aAckerman & Anor v Lay & Ors _h[electronic resource]
260			_c2008
520			_a[2008] EWCA Civ 1428, 16 December 2008. A notice served under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 S42 claiming a new lease over a flat in a leasehold property severed the lease of the flat from the lease of the rest of the building. As a result, the Act did not provide for continuation of the lease of the whole property. Appellant tenants (A) appealed against a decision that they were not entitled to buy the freehold of a building that they had purchased from resident landlords (L) under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 S8. A held a long lease of the building that comprised several flats, one of which A occupied. Shortly before their lease expired, they sought a new lease to their flat, which L objected to. A then sought to purchase the whole freehold instead, under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967. L defended the enfranchisement claim, saying that S42 was not relevant as the lease of A had already expired before they sought to make the purchase. Held: appeal dismissed. Comments recorded in the lease only applied to the lease of A's flat, not the whole building.
521			_aAdvanced
590			_aKA
650	2	4	_aLEASEHOLD REFORM ACT 1967 S2(2)
650	2	4	_aLEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993 S42
650	2	4	_aMALEKSHAD V HOWARD DE WALDEN ESTATES LTD (NO. 2)
650	2	4	_aACKERMAN & ANOR V LAY & ORS
650	2	4	_aHOWARD DE WALDEN ESTATES LTD V AGGIO & ORS
650	2	4	_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954
651		4	_aEngland and Wales _y1543-
690			_aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES-LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2008/1428.html _zView the item free of charge online at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c109139 _d109139