000			01846cad a22002655a 4500
001			L146742
008			090223s2009 xxkd f 000 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u146742
041	0		_aeng
050	0	4	_a333.72 $2 18
110	2		_aCB Richard Ellis _93675
245	0	0	_aWho pays for green? _bthe economics of sustainable buildings _h[electronic resource]
260			_a[S.l.] _bCBRE _c2009
505	2		_aIntroduction -- Executive summary -- Why all the fuss? -- The economics of green buildings -- Conclusions -- References -- Appendix 1: Environmental assessment methods: BREEAM and LEED
520			_aResearch on the commercial payback value of developing sustainable corporate buildings in comparison to the costs. Analyses the measurement tools checking buildings' energy efficiency. Compares production costs and levels of rent of sustainable buildings to conventional ones. Finds that less than 15% of extra costs are necessary to reach the most demanding level of building sustainability, the zero carbon emission building, which is much higher than the levels required by BRE Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM) and Leadership In Energy And Environmental Design (LEED). Suggests that in the future, more evidence in rent levels, running costs and investment costs of sustainable buildings will increase their development and occupation.
521			_aAdvanced
590			_aKA NTK
650	2	4	_aCOMMERCIAL ENERGY PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATES
650	2	4	_aBRE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHOD (BREEAM)
650	2	4	_aLEADERSHIP IN ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN (LEED) GREEN BUILDING RATING SYSTEM
651		4	_aUnited Kingdom _y
690			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.cbre.co.uk/uk_en/research/special_reports _zView this item free of charge at www.cbre.co.uk...
942			_n0
999			_c109275 _d109275