000			01031cab a2200217 4500
001			X1373
008			090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u16579
041			_aeng
245			_aMurphy v SoS for Wales and Torfean BC
260			_c1994
350			_a0
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v1994 JPL 156-161(6)
520			_aQBD 20 October 1992. Dwelling-house extension - built in excess of planning permission - significant difference not de minimus - consideration of Pehrsson and Top Deck Holdings - imposition of condition - should Inspector have considered this where no such condition has been canvassed - PPG2 paragraph 16 created an exception to the general rule laid down in Top Deck but in this case the Inspector had no obligation to consider the imposition of a condition.
650			_aEXTENSIONS
650			_aPLANNING PERMISSION
650			_aPLANNING POLICY GUIDANCE NOTE 2
690			_aPLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c10933 _d10933